In article <
[email protected]>,
Ben Kaufman <
[email protected]> writes:
> ...
> The Salt Lake City woman was wearing a helmet and brightly colored clothing and
> was riding at the right side of the road when she was hit from behind by a SUV,
> whose driver said she did not see the cyclist.
> ...
>
> http://kutv.com/utah/UT--BicycleFatality-en/resources_news_html
"Bicyclists and members of Johnson's family held a rally at the
Capitol Wednesday in support of legislation that would require
motorists passing bicycles to give them a three-foot clearance,
except where the roadway is too narrow."
While such a law /should/ be enacted, it won't be worth
a mound of lima beans if it isn't enforced. I can see
legalistic arguments around the ability of drivers or
witnesses to discern the difference between 35 and 37
inches. Just slapping another arcane law in the books
won't affect the mayhem. As for "where the roadway is
too narrow," that's when cyclists should be free to
take the lane.
Drivers who take lives so lackadaisically must be held
accountable, made to assume responsibility, and face
consequences according to the gravity and severity of
their actions. Or else this kind of tragedy will just
continue. And such killer drivers should be automatically
banned from driving for life, just for starters.
Maybe such drivers should also be compelled to pay for
advertising/media blitzes about the rights of cyclists, in
the jurisdictions in which they offended. And while they're
at it, maybe they should be compelled to appear in TV adverts
where they admit to disregarding the rights of the cyclists
(or pedestrians) they killed, and explain the hard
consequences they're undergoing.
regards,
Tom
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca