Boestering said:I think you are wrong. The tour is much bigger then Lance. As I said , in the eighties there were almost 300k on Alpe D'huez (when the dutch were winning the stages). In California, Australia or the UK the fans would be there for LA. In the more traditional countries like France, Italy, Belgium or Spain, the fans come for the event. The press however will be more interested in LA. He is not the Tiger Woods of cycling, he is the Lance Armstrong of cycling. A guy who wins 7 TdF's deserves respect and shouldn't be compared with someone from another sport. I respect him but I also respect AC (maybe the greatest GT-cyclist ever). But they will never be at the same height of Merckx, Hinault or Coppi.
Your first comment about the tour being much bigger than LA, makes me think you did not read his post. He began by saying its hard to see a difference in the crowds with or w/o LA since it is such a big event. Let' wait a few more years before we declare AC the best GT ever. He might in fact prove to be but it is way to early to even speculate at this point. I guess you think Red Grange is the best college football player too.