What happened to BentRiderOnline?




> John, anyone who uses two operating systems is way beyond my level of
> competence. I figure I can spend the rest of my life trying to figure out
> Windows XP. IE as a browser seems to work well most of the time, but it
> likes to freeze on me more than I would like. Usually a reboot will correct
> the problem, but sometimes I have to go to a restore point in order to get
> back to a normal operating condition.
>
> I am an old dog now and I refuse to learn any new tricks. I grew up in an
> era where all you had to know was how to turn something on and how to turn
> something off and tune the station and adjust the volume. All this computer
> stuff is going to be the death of me.


praise jebus.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Edward Dolan
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "bil" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:FnmIc.3245$f9.2581@fed1read02...
> >
> > We are the masses of the computer literate.
> > We will bury YOU!
> >
> >
> > Must be difficult for you being a retarded genius....

>
> Better to be a retarded genius than a blooming idiot like you! But I always
> have to laugh at these morons who delight in their one-upmanship when it
> comes to finding their way around a computer. The fact is though they can't
> find their way around a subject as they prove every time they post. They are
> like idiot savants. They know the how but not the what or the why of
> anything. Like I said - a blooming idiot!
>
> > Do still have fond memories of the old orphanage?
> > Any pix of you being beaten/sodomized by the nuns?

>
> Jeez, thanks for reminding me Bil - **** You Too!


Just in case you hadn't noticed Ed,
bil spells his name with out the capital B, so get it right or he may
not know who your talking to.
 
Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of the
web.
No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
Whats a virus?
Whats a firewall?
If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
week you see a virus showing up.
M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
here in Canada.

Good Luck.
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of the
> web.
> No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> Whats a virus?
> Whats a firewall?
> If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> week you see a virus showing up.
> M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
> here in Canada.
>
> Good Luck.


If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3% you'd
see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply because
far more machines out there run MS's OS.

Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:170720041139572834%[email protected]...
>
> >
> > MLB, you do not understand my psychology. First off, if my hard drive

goes
> > and I lose all my music (over 40 GB worth) I will have to kill myself.

There
> > is no other possible solution.
> >
> > However, my back up plan is to say screw all this computer ****! The
> > Internet is nothing but chaos and if Microsoft can't get a handle on it,
> > then I sure as hell am not going to get a handle on it. I have lived 99%

of
> > my life without computers and I can easily go back to living without a
> > computer. I will only take so much aggravation and then I will be gone.

It
> > will be ... "got along before I met you, will get along without you

now!"
> >
> > But what are you recommending that I do to avoid all the problems that

you
> > foresee for the immediate future?

>
> Ed if you value your life/music then you should back it the hell up.
> I wouldn't trust anything of value to M$.
> They stopped making IE a year ago and have not done any updates since.
> However development has begun again and will be available in the next
> SP for that stupid OS.
> Get a real browser.
> Slugger


I think it will take more than 50 CD's to back up all my music. That
translates to a lot of work. But I think I will have to do it. There is
nothing else on my computer that I care about, but I do care about the
music.

I will try out a different browser one of these days, but I will stay with
Windows XP for my OS. Changing OS's is not for the faint of heart.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> I think it will take more than 50 CD's to back up all my music. That
> translates to a lot of work. But I think I will have to do it. There is
> nothing else on my computer that I care about, but I do care about the
> music.
>
> I will try out a different browser one of these days, but I will stay with
> Windows XP for my OS. Changing OS's is not for the faint of heart.
>
> --
> Regards,


If you had a DVD burner it would only take less than 10
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:170720041151153485%[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Edward Dolan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "bil" <[email protected]> wrote in message

news:FnmIc.3245$f9.2581@fed1read02...
> > >
> > > We are the masses of the computer literate.
> > > We will bury YOU!
> > >
> > >
> > > Must be difficult for you being a retarded genius....

> >
> > Better to be a retarded genius than a blooming idiot like you! But I

always
> > have to laugh at these morons who delight in their one-upmanship when it
> > comes to finding their way around a computer. The fact is though they

can't
> > find their way around a subject as they prove every time they post. They

are
> > like idiot savants. They know the how but not the what or the why of
> > anything. Like I said - a blooming idiot!
> >
> > > Do still have fond memories of the old orphanage?
> > > Any pix of you being beaten/sodomized by the nuns?

> >
> > Jeez, thanks for reminding me Bil - **** You Too!

>
> Just in case you hadn't noticed Ed,
> bil spells his name with out the capital B, so get it right or he may
> not know who your talking to.


I did note the lack of capitalization, not only with respect to his name but
to very many other words which he uses which should also be capitalized. As
he is the only Bil on this newsgroup who spells his name with only one l, I
think I will continue to capitalized his name whether he likes it or not. I
have to show my contempt for him in ways other than just swearing a blue
streak at him. By and large I do not like any of these shortened names that
are purposely misspelled nor all the other short cuts that computer types
think are cool. As far as I am concerned, if a sentence doesn't look right,
then it is not right. Esthetics count!

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:6ghKc.105325$IQ4.80324@attbi_s02...
>
> "Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> > Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> > experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of the
> > web.
> > No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> > I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> > Whats a virus?
> > Whats a firewall?
> > If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> > I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> > week you see a virus showing up.
> > M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> > If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
> > here in Canada.
> >
> > Good Luck.

>
> If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3%

you'd
> see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply because
> far more machines out there run MS's OS.
>
> Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist


You have sure got that right Mark! Of all the people I know who have
computers, only one has a Mac. And why are Macs so damn expensive in the
first place! If they can't compete on price, then they can't compete period!

I note that Wal-Mart has lately come out with some computers (E-Machines)
that sell for less than $500. with the Linux OS. Maybe Linux will be
competition for Microsoft's Windows?

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
In article <6ghKc.105325$IQ4.80324@attbi_s02>, Mark Leuck
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> > Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> > experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of the
> > web.
> > No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> > I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> > Whats a virus?
> > Whats a firewall?
> > If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> > I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> > week you see a virus showing up.
> > M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> > If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
> > here in Canada.
> >
> > Good Luck.

>
> If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3% you'd
> see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply because
> far more machines out there run MS's OS.
>
> Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist
>
>



Unix has been around alot longer than the mac or windows. Web servers
have traditionally been Unix because of their level of security and
advancements in networking.
Macs are currently running FreeBSD, a version of Unix.
Windows 3.1 was never meant to be on a network and since every other OS
since has shipped with all the ports open. Why? To make updating
programs simple, and user friendly in the updating process. Everyone
likes wizards :/
In the real world of networked computing you are getting viruses in the
email every damn day. Lets not forget spyware and the like. Now how are
all your ports open going to help these malware apps from doing their
job?
They won't.
Your door is open right from the start.
If you are installing windows you cannot go on the web without first
installing a 3rd party product to secure your OS from the evil that
lurks.
Then you have to install an assload of M$ patches to secure every
crappy piece of software in that leaky boat.
That is Microsoft. I won't settle for less.
They fail and their latest plan is to SELL you a virus software of
their own recipe.

So where is the savings?
How much time/money have some of you wasted taking in your computers to
be recovered or data lost. Is it worth it?

Macs are secure machines, no doubt about it. Not without their
problems but certainly far more secure than 'doze.

Slugger
 
In article <[email protected]>, Edward Dolan
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:6ghKc.105325$IQ4.80324@attbi_s02...
> >
> > "Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> > > Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> > > experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of the
> > > web.
> > > No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> > > I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> > > Whats a virus?
> > > Whats a firewall?
> > > If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> > > I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> > > week you see a virus showing up.
> > > M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> > > If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
> > > here in Canada.
> > >
> > > Good Luck.

> >
> > If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3%

> you'd
> > see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply because
> > far more machines out there run MS's OS.
> >
> > Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist

>
> You have sure got that right Mark! Of all the people I know who have
> computers, only one has a Mac. And why are Macs so damn expensive in the
> first place! If they can't compete on price, then they can't compete period!
>
> I note that Wal-Mart has lately come out with some computers (E-Machines)
> that sell for less than $500. with the Linux OS. Maybe Linux will be
> competition for Microsoft's Windows?


Macs don't even compete with windows. Apple innovates and M$ theives.
Plain and simple.

Mac's are expensive?
Compared to a Dell they are cheaper.
Go to Dell's website and configure an XPS(their top of the line
home/office PC), then go to Apple's site and configure a G5.

The mac wins in price and performance.
Bottom of the line G5 for 1999.00 is a dual 1.8ghz
top of the line XPS is 3.2ghz for 1999.00 add 3.4ghz upgrade the the
Dell for another 760.00 because it will need a speed boost(not that it
will make much difference.). There was no option to add a second CPU to
match the Dual CPU's on the low end mac so i just upgraded the XPS to
3.4ghz, i'm sure adding another similar CPU would cost another 700
bux.)
Now add the firewire ports to the XPS. Since they don't offer the FW800
ports we'll add 4 FW400's to match the mac's 2x400's and 2x800's
thats 50 bux each. In fact it doesn't look possible to add more than
one FW port, at least not on the site.
Add another 30 bux for the media software to match Apple's iLife apps
that come free with the system.
Add Norton because your PC isn't safe with out it.
Add another 80 bucks for the XP pro edition. You know, for the added
security!! :D
Security is free with the mac.
Ok in all fairness the XPS gives you a monitor with it. A value of
about 150 bux. And also in all fairness the PC comes with elcheapo
kodak camera. a value of 100 bux.
The PC comes with more RAM so add 75 bux to the mac.
And another 50 bux to get the video card to be similar(in RAM) to the
PC's.
The mac's total without monitor is 2124.00
The PC with imaginary 4 FW ports and monitor and free crappy camera
comes to 3058.00
Lets be good to Dell and take off 500 bux for the monitor and crappy
camera.
Still the total equals 2558.00 for the XPS and the Mac for a mere
2124.00

Sure you could go to Walmart and buy a vanilla PC for cheap, but it
won't be half the computer that Apple or Dell is selling.

Ok so never mind the price, the mac wins,whatever.
The Dual G5 will run circles around the XPS.
The G5 beats AMD chips in 4 out of 5 speed tests. AMD is faster than
intel chips on single operations. intel excels over AMD on multitasking
operations.
The G5 is a true speed champ.

So price/performance the G5 Mac wins hands down.
And i don't get viruses.
And i don't have to wonder what the hell is going with my PC since
windows is the most inconsistant POS i have ever used.

ok i'm done venting now.
Just so you know Ed, macs are competitively priced to their equivalent.
I'm not trying to talk you into switching, since you have already
stated you are incapable of learning anything new. Simply pointing out
that you are wrong about your assumptions on the mac.

Slugger
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:180720042037201523%[email protected]...
[...]
> ok i'm done venting now.
> Just so you know Ed, macs are competitively priced to their equivalent.
> I'm not trying to talk you into switching, since you have already
> stated you are incapable of learning anything new. Simply pointing out
> that you are wrong about your assumptions on the mac.
>
> Slugger


The moral of this little story is never, never get into a discussion with a
Mac user. They are fanatics about their computers.

But Slugger misses my point entirely in that I do not give a hoot about top
of the line computers. I only care about bottom of the line computers. So
far, no one beats Wal-Mart with their E-Machines loaded with Linux for less
than $500. and that includes a monitor and I believe a printer too. My own
set up was a Wal-Mart special HP for $700. which I got a couple of years
ago. Slugger is in the stratosphere. I, as is my want, have both feet
planted squarely on planet earth.

By the way, it is not that I am incapable of learning anything new, it is
just that I prefer not to - since the world is full of **** and I do not see
any reason why I should have to stay abreast of every piece of new **** that
comes down the pike. This is the sort of wisdom that only comes with age.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:180720042027587846%[email protected]...
> In article <6ghKc.105325$IQ4.80324@attbi_s02>, Mark Leuck
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> > > Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> > > experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of

the
> > > web.
> > > No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> > > I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> > > Whats a virus?
> > > Whats a firewall?
> > > If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> > > I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> > > week you see a virus showing up.
> > > M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> > > If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different node
> > > here in Canada.
> > >
> > > Good Luck.

> >
> > If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3%

you'd
> > see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply

because
> > far more machines out there run MS's OS.
> >
> > Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist
> >
> >

>
>
> Unix has been around a lot longer than the mac or windows. Web servers
> have traditionally been Unix because of their level of security and
> advancements in networking.
> Macs are currently running FreeBSD, a version of Unix.
> Windows 3.1 was never meant to be on a network and since every other OS
> since has shipped with all the ports open. Why? To make updating
> programs simple, and user friendly in the updating process. Everyone
> likes wizards :/
> In the real world of networked computing you are getting viruses in the
> email every damn day. Lets not forget spyware and the like. Now how are
> all your ports open going to help these malware apps from doing their
> job?
> They won't.
> Your door is open right from the start.
> If you are installing windows you cannot go on the web without first
> installing a 3rd party product to secure your OS from the evil that
> lurks.
> Then you have to install an assload of M$ patches to secure every
> crappy piece of software in that leaky boat.
> That is Microsoft. I won't settle for less.
> They fail and their latest plan is to SELL you a virus software of
> their own recipe.
>
> So where is the savings?
> How much time/money have some of you wasted taking in your computers to
> be recovered or data lost. Is it worth it?
>
> Macs are secure machines, no doubt about it. Not without their
> problems but certainly far more secure than 'doze.
>
> Slugger


Slugger is making the same argument here that a friend of mine who has been
working around computers all of his life also makes. He is the lone Mac user
that I know. But unless you are fairly knowledgeable like Slugger and my
friend, you are not ever going to change the operating system that comes
already loaded on your computer.

It is also my understanding that the Mac is sufficiently different so that a
lot of new learning will have to be accomplished. Most of us do not really
enjoy learning anything new. It is hard work. Windows, as user friendly as
it might be, still keeps me hopping all the time with just one problem after
another. The vast majority of computer users are never going to learn the
Mac. Changing an OS is not for the faint of heart.

The main thing my friend who has the Mac complains about is that most all
programs are designed for Windows and not always for the Mac. But other than
that, he is as enthusiastic as Slugger is about his Mac OS.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:180720042037201523%[email protected]...
>
> Macs don't even compete with windows. Apple innovates and M$ theives.
> Plain and simple.


One could say Apple does the same thing, in the case of the mac they got
much of the technology from Xerox, even the Ipod was somewhat based on
existing MP3 players, they do have a great design but also got exclusive use
of new and smaller hard drives which other companies couldn't get when they
created the first hard drive based players

> Mac's are expensive?
> Compared to a Dell they are cheaper.
> Go to Dell's website and configure an XPS(their top of the line
> home/office PC), then go to Apple's site and configure a G5.


Apples to oranges (pun intended), Apple now only deals with dual processor
models whereas Dell does not at least for consumer systems, I could go
elsewhere and get a dual AMD Opteron system with a better graphics card for
less than what I just looked at with Apple

> The mac wins in price and performance.
> Bottom of the line G5 for 1999.00 is a dual 1.8ghz


Wanna know WHY Apples only offers dual processor models? Because IBM can't
produce anything as fast as what Intel and AMD currently put out (yet). The
only way Apple can even come close speedwise is with the dualies, note they
are also all water cooled because it is almost a requirement with the G5 but
isn't with AMD (note Intel now is running into heat problems on the new
Northgate processors)

Apple has in the past made outlandish claims as far as performance that has
never been backed up and refuted many times dating back to the original
imac, while the G4 and 5 are good processors they aren't nearly as powerful
as Intel or AMD. (remember last years "fastest desktop made?" campaign? It
was bogus when actual independent tests were done

Here's a few benchmarks from a quick Google search

http://www.alienware.com/review_pages/review_template.aspx?FileName=review_macworld_1203.asp

http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/desktops/0,39023846,39117451,00.htm

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112749,pg,8,00.asp

Look em up all you want, the result is the same, while it is a step up for
Apple it still doesn't beat a high end PC


> top of the line XPS is 3.2ghz for 1999.00 add 3.4ghz upgrade the the
> Dell for another 760.00 because it will need a speed boost(not that it
> will make much difference.). There was no option to add a second CPU to
> match the Dual CPU's on the low end mac so i just upgraded the XPS to
> 3.4ghz, i'm sure adding another similar CPU would cost another 700
> bux.)


Yes if you went Intel, if you went AMD it would be much cheaper and far more
powerful. And Dell doesn't deal with dual processors for regular customers
however we have quite a few dual and quad Dells at work

> Now add the firewire ports to the XPS. Since they don't offer the FW800
> ports we'll add 4 FW400's to match the mac's 2x400's and 2x800's
> thats 50 bux each. In fact it doesn't look possible to add more than
> one FW port, at least not on the site.


Don't need to, the vast majority use USB :)

I have a firewire drive and a couple of ports, almost never used since to me
USB is more convenient and much more supported. The new FW800 is twice as
fast but its also fairly new and not that many devices take advantage of the
speed.

Apple shot themselves in the foot with firewire, one of the reasons USB
became so popular even when it wasn't as good was because of the high
royalty price Apple wanted for it, motherboard makers chose USB instead

> Add another 30 bux for the media software to match Apple's iLife apps
> that come free with the system.


Why are you bringing the PC up to Mac standards? Instead you need to go the
other way. For instance if you are a gamer the Mac is out of the picture
completely, even with the same video card the Mac doesn't come close in
sheer performance

And since we are now talking software consider the fact the PC has far more
titles available for it than the Mac

> Add Norton because your PC isn't safe with out it.


Lol Norton sucks in my opinion, use McAffee, if you want a firewall don't
use either and get a router

> Add another 80 bucks for the XP pro edition. You know, for the added
> security!! :D


We've discussed that in previous threads but for now you are correct

> Security is free with the mac.


Nonsense, the fact is no hacker will waste his time on 3% of the market when
he can do far more damage to 90% which is why exploits on the Mac haven't
been found yet, no software is perfect and neither is OSX. Since it appears
Apple is starting to move away from computers in general I doubt they ever
go beyond the share of the market they currently have.

> Ok in all fairness the XPS gives you a monitor with it. A value of
> about 150 bux. And also in all fairness the PC comes with elcheapo
> kodak camera. a value of 100 bux.


Actually the camera is pretty nice and worth more than $100, a couple of
guys at work got Dells and the cameras, and in all honesty $150 will get you
a shitty monitor

> The PC comes with more RAM so add 75 bux to the mac.
> And another 50 bux to get the video card to be similar(in RAM) to the
> PC's.
> The mac's total without monitor is 2124.00


I was pricing the 2.5ghz dual G5 which came out to almost $3,000

> The PC with imaginary 4 FW ports and monitor and free crappy camera
> comes to 3058.00
> Lets be good to Dell and take off 500 bux for the monitor and crappy
> camera.
> Still the total equals 2558.00 for the XPS and the Mac for a mere
> 2124.00
>
> Sure you could go to Walmart and buy a vanilla PC for cheap, but it
> won't be half the computer that Apple or Dell is selling.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Sorry but that was a funny one, the reason why I build my own PC's is
because I could get a far better machine without going through proprietary
Apple stuff and semi-proprietary Dell stuff (Dell has non-standard
motherboards with non-standard power supplies and they only seem to work
with Dell keyboards)

But since most do not build their own machines please continue

> Ok so never mind the price, the mac wins,whatever.
> The Dual G5 will run circles around the XPS.


Again comparing Apples to oranges

> The G5 beats AMD chips in 4 out of 5 speed tests.


According to who? I hope you aren't getting this from Apple, they tend to
inflate figures quite a bit (see above)

> AMD is faster than
> intel chips on single operations. intel excels over AMD on multitasking
> operations.


Actually the tests go back and forth between Intel and AMD regardless of
multitasking, while Intel does have Hyperthreading the AMD chip is much more
efficient, remember the AMD is running a full gigahertz below the compared
Intel chip

> The G5 is a true speed champ.


Only in Apples mind, unfortunatly for them the rest of the world knows
better which is why Apple has only 3% of the market down from a high of 5%
10 years ago

> So price/performance the G5 Mac wins hands down.


Umm no

> And i don't get viruses.


I don't either and I rarely run anti-virus software btw

> And i don't have to wonder what the hell is going with my PC since
> windows is the most inconsistant POS i have ever used.


I haven't rebooted XP now in about 3 or 4 months at least between the 2
machines I have, in fact the last time I did was because I installed new
video drivers not because it crashed. The problem Apple doesn't have to deal
with that Microsoft does is Apple has complete control of the core machine,
Microsoft has to deal with thousands of different configurations that don't
often conform to standards, not defending Microsoft but in my opinion the
biggest cause of crashes is due to things other than the operating system
such as crappy drivers etc. I'm not saying Microsoft doesn't have its share
of bugs but much that has been written about crashing computers isn't their
fault.

> ok i'm done venting now.
> Just so you know Ed, macs are competitively priced to their equivalent.
> I'm not trying to talk you into switching, since you have already
> stated you are incapable of learning anything new. Simply pointing out
> that you are wrong about your assumptions on the mac.


Oddly enough I have to agree with Ed on this one (shudder)
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Slugger is making the same argument here that a friend of mine who has

been
> working around computers all of his life also makes. He is the lone Mac

user
> that I know. But unless you are fairly knowledgeable like Slugger and my
> friend, you are not ever going to change the operating system that comes
> already loaded on your computer.


True

> It is also my understanding that the Mac is sufficiently different so that

a
> lot of new learning will have to be accomplished. Most of us do not really
> enjoy learning anything new. It is hard work. Windows, as user friendly as
> it might be, still keeps me hopping all the time with just one problem

after
> another. The vast majority of computer users are never going to learn the
> Mac. Changing an OS is not for the faint of heart.


Different does not always mean harder, I've played with OSX a little and if
someone cannot go from Windows to it they are hopeless

> The main thing my friend who has the Mac complains about is that most all
> programs are designed for Windows and not always for the Mac. But other

than
> that, he is as enthusiastic as Slugger is about his Mac OS.


True the PC has many more titles, you could use an emulator with the Mac
much like you can with Linux but many times it is way slower and doesn't
always work
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:saIKc.117664$IQ4.50374@attbi_s02...
[...]
> Nonsense, the fact is no hacker will waste his time on 3% of the market

when
> he can do far more damage to 90% which is why exploits on the Mac haven't
> been found yet, no software is perfect and neither is OSX. Since it

appears
> Apple is starting to move away from computers in general I doubt they ever
> go beyond the share of the market they currently have.


Well, Hells Bells! I sure am not going to even think about a Mac is this is
true. It would be just my luck to learn something new and that have it all
go the way of the Dodo Bird.

> > Ok in all fairness the XPS gives you a monitor with it. A value of
> > about 150 bux. And also in all fairness the PC comes with elcheapo
> > kodak camera. a value of 100 bux.

>
> Actually the camera is pretty nice and worth more than $100, a couple of
> guys at work got Dells and the cameras, and in all honesty $150 will get

you
> a shitty monitor


I just spent $90. on a 19" monitor (a Dell - refurbished from TigerDirect)
and it is a great improvement over what I had (a 15" monitor from HP) for
looking at pictures. I think it is almost over kill though for text.
[...]

> > Sure you could go to Walmart and buy a vanilla PC for cheap, but it
> > won't be half the computer that Apple or Dell is selling.

>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>
> Sorry but that was a funny one, the reason why I build my own PC's is
> because I could get a far better machine without going through proprietary
> Apple stuff and semi-proprietary Dell stuff (Dell has non-standard
> motherboards with non-standard power supplies and they only seem to work
> with Dell keyboards)
>
> But since most do not build their own machines please continue


I only know of one kid who builds his own computers. I have taken to
monitoring what the local Wal-Mart sells here in my home town in the
electronics department. They will get a shipment of a dozen computers
(complete systems all in one box) and they will all be sold within a few
weeks. Folks here appreciate low prices. They mostly sell HP's at very
attractive prices, but some Compaqs and E-Machines too.
[...]

> Only in Apples mind, unfortunatly for them the rest of the world knows
> better which is why Apple has only 3% of the market down from a high of 5%
> 10 years ago


Good Grief! You mean they are selling fewer now than they did 10 years ago?
I have never seen a Mac at Wal-Mart. My philosophy has always been that if
you can't buy it at Wal-Mart, then you don't need it!
[...]

> Oddly enough I have to agree with Ed on this one (shudder)


Now if I could only get him to put periods on the end of his sentences, we
would really be getting someplace!

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:rhIKc.113933$MB3.110233@attbi_s04...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...

[...]
> > It is also my understanding that the Mac is sufficiently different so

that
> a
> > lot of new learning will have to be accomplished. Most of us do not

really
> > enjoy learning anything new. It is hard work. Windows, as user friendly

as
> > it might be, still keeps me hopping all the time with just one problem

> after
> > another. The vast majority of computer users are never going to learn

the
> > Mac. Changing an OS is not for the faint of heart.

>
> Different does not always mean harder, I've played with OSX a little and

if
> someone cannot go from Windows to it they are hopeless


I have tried different email programs. They are all similar, yet have enough
differences so that you have to apply yourself to learn those differences. I
went from Outlook Express to Eudora, but I gave up on Eudora as there were
just too many new things to learn about it. I think what happens is that
once you have invested a certain amount of time and effort into learning
something, like I did with my Outlook Express, then you hate to give it up
because the convenience and speed factor is finally working for you. Maybe
Eudora is better than OE, but I will never know because I did not have the
patience to learn it.

The young learn everything relatively effortlessly because the world is new
to them. That is not true for us older folks. The world has grown old and we
with it. We have only limited time left in our lives and we cannot be
spending inordinate amounts of time learning new things.

Surprisingly, IncrediMail was very easy to learn and I keep that for special
occasions when I want all the bells and whistles.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:

> ...
> Good Grief! You mean they are selling fewer now than they did 10 years ago?
> I have never seen a Mac at Wal-Mart. My philosophy has always been that if
> you can't buy it at Wal-Mart, then you don't need it!...


What brands of recumbent bicycles does Wal-Mart sell?

--
Tom Sherman – Quad City Area
 
I'm just glad all you guys out there are spending 2K or more for the state
of the art, so a few years later I can buy it for $400.

When we get Linux up to speed that will drop the price down even more.

"Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:180720042037201523%[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Edward Dolan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:6ghKc.105325$IQ4.80324@attbi_s02...
> > >
> > > "Slugger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:170720041216324541%[email protected]...
> > > > Those of you having problems connecting to BROL may also be
> > > > experiencing Denial of Service attacks on some of the main nodes of

the
> > > > web.
> > > > No problems here mind you, Safari or Camino work fine using OS 10.3
> > > > I wouldn't expect anything less from a mac.
> > > > Whats a virus?
> > > > Whats a firewall?
> > > > If anything M$ makes me feel better about my purchase.
> > > > I wake up everyday and check the news on yahoo! and typically once a
> > > > week you see a virus showing up.
> > > > M$ is too hostile a computing environment for me.
> > > > If it is a DoS attack i may be accessing BROL through a different

node
> > > > here in Canada.
> > > >
> > > > Good Luck.
> > >
> > > If Apple had 95+% of the computer market like Microsoft instead of 3%

> > you'd
> > > see it the other way around. Microsoft exploits are common simply

because
> > > far more machines out there run MS's OS.
> > >
> > > Mac's vulnerabilities haven't much been found yet but they do exist

> >
> > You have sure got that right Mark! Of all the people I know who have
> > computers, only one has a Mac. And why are Macs so damn expensive in the
> > first place! If they can't compete on price, then they can't compete

period!
> >
> > I note that Wal-Mart has lately come out with some computers

(E-Machines)
> > that sell for less than $500. with the Linux OS. Maybe Linux will be
> > competition for Microsoft's Windows?

>
> Macs don't even compete with windows. Apple innovates and M$ theives.
> Plain and simple.
>
> Mac's are expensive?
> Compared to a Dell they are cheaper.
> Go to Dell's website and configure an XPS(their top of the line
> home/office PC), then go to Apple's site and configure a G5.
>
> The mac wins in price and performance.
> Bottom of the line G5 for 1999.00 is a dual 1.8ghz
> top of the line XPS is 3.2ghz for 1999.00 add 3.4ghz upgrade the the
> Dell for another 760.00 because it will need a speed boost(not that it
> will make much difference.). There was no option to add a second CPU to
> match the Dual CPU's on the low end mac so i just upgraded the XPS to
> 3.4ghz, i'm sure adding another similar CPU would cost another 700
> bux.)
> Now add the firewire ports to the XPS. Since they don't offer the FW800
> ports we'll add 4 FW400's to match the mac's 2x400's and 2x800's
> thats 50 bux each. In fact it doesn't look possible to add more than
> one FW port, at least not on the site.
> Add another 30 bux for the media software to match Apple's iLife apps
> that come free with the system.
> Add Norton because your PC isn't safe with out it.
> Add another 80 bucks for the XP pro edition. You know, for the added
> security!! :D
> Security is free with the mac.
> Ok in all fairness the XPS gives you a monitor with it. A value of
> about 150 bux. And also in all fairness the PC comes with elcheapo
> kodak camera. a value of 100 bux.
> The PC comes with more RAM so add 75 bux to the mac.
> And another 50 bux to get the video card to be similar(in RAM) to the
> PC's.
> The mac's total without monitor is 2124.00
> The PC with imaginary 4 FW ports and monitor and free crappy camera
> comes to 3058.00
> Lets be good to Dell and take off 500 bux for the monitor and crappy
> camera.
> Still the total equals 2558.00 for the XPS and the Mac for a mere
> 2124.00
>
> Sure you could go to Walmart and buy a vanilla PC for cheap, but it
> won't be half the computer that Apple or Dell is selling.
>
> Ok so never mind the price, the mac wins,whatever.
> The Dual G5 will run circles around the XPS.
> The G5 beats AMD chips in 4 out of 5 speed tests. AMD is faster than
> intel chips on single operations. intel excels over AMD on multitasking
> operations.
> The G5 is a true speed champ.
>
> So price/performance the G5 Mac wins hands down.
> And i don't get viruses.
> And i don't have to wonder what the hell is going with my PC since
> windows is the most inconsistant POS i have ever used.
>
> ok i'm done venting now.
> Just so you know Ed, macs are competitively priced to their equivalent.
> I'm not trying to talk you into switching, since you have already
> stated you are incapable of learning anything new. Simply pointing out
> that you are wrong about your assumptions on the mac.
>
> Slugger
 
"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Good Grief! You mean they are selling fewer now than they did 10 years

ago?
> > I have never seen a Mac at Wal-Mart. My philosophy has always been that

if
> > you can't buy it at Wal-Mart, then you don't need it!...

>
> What brands of recumbent bicycles does Wal-Mart sell?


Knowing this is nothing but a rhetorical question, I will say simply that a
bicycle is a bicycle is a bicycle ... . In most of the world, others would
die for those bicycles that Wal-Mart sells at give-away prices.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> It is also my understanding that the Mac is sufficiently different so that

a
> lot of new learning will have to be accomplished. Most of us do not really
> enjoy learning anything new. It is hard work. Windows, as user friendly as
> it might be, still keeps me hopping all the time with just one problem

after
> another. The vast majority of computer users are never going to learn the
> Mac. Changing an OS is not for the faint of heart.
>


Actually it's not that hard to learn how to use a Mac if you know how to run
a PC. I found that out by signing up for a Photoshop class at our local
tech school. When I walked into the classroom there were only Macs there.
I was telling the teacher I was out of there when she said sit down, pay
attention, and I'll show you how to use a Mac. Turns out the class would
have folded if I left so she was motivated. She was also good looking and I
liked the idea of learning how to deal with a Mac so I stayed. I'm glad I
did.

There are things I like a lot about Macs and in some ways I find them more
intuitive, but they aren't crash proof - from time to time I managed to
crash the one I was using.

skip