K
kantspel
Guest
Dan Volker wrote:
> "Stephen Baker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Dan V says:
>>
>><snip rant>
>>
>>Dan - you just don't "get" it, do you?
>>
>>;-)
>>
>>Steve
>
>
> I don't think any of you guys do either.
> If a person is having a lot of fun doing a certain kind of ride, that
> should be the "end all" in most circles, but with you guys, if they are not
> having fun on the right kind of bike, doing your kind of trails, then they
> are doing it wrong, and are clueless about the right way to have fun.
> And having an argument about the right way to have fun seems pretty stupid
> all by itself, and obviously, I've been stupid enough to wade in to this ;-)
> So you're right, I have been stupid, and no, I don't get it.
>
>
> DanV
>
>
For starters, reasoning with the regulars here is like reasoning with a
drunk, everything changes minute to minute. Unless your in the clic
then forget about being treated with an ounce of respect.
Second, you talked **** about how tech your local trails are and it
became plainly obvious that they aren't when you compare them TO THE
REST OF THE COUNTRY. You should have backed down, you didn't; even a
weatherman could have predicted that would everyone pounce.
Third, you called JD to the table on riding skills, why, what's the
point, your not going to ride with him. While he may not be a
compasionate useneter he is respected as a rider, choosing to go down
that road was just bizarre. He may indeed not live up to all the hype
but who give a ****.
> "Stephen Baker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Dan V says:
>>
>><snip rant>
>>
>>Dan - you just don't "get" it, do you?
>>
>>;-)
>>
>>Steve
>
>
> I don't think any of you guys do either.
> If a person is having a lot of fun doing a certain kind of ride, that
> should be the "end all" in most circles, but with you guys, if they are not
> having fun on the right kind of bike, doing your kind of trails, then they
> are doing it wrong, and are clueless about the right way to have fun.
> And having an argument about the right way to have fun seems pretty stupid
> all by itself, and obviously, I've been stupid enough to wade in to this ;-)
> So you're right, I have been stupid, and no, I don't get it.
>
>
> DanV
>
>
For starters, reasoning with the regulars here is like reasoning with a
drunk, everything changes minute to minute. Unless your in the clic
then forget about being treated with an ounce of respect.
Second, you talked **** about how tech your local trails are and it
became plainly obvious that they aren't when you compare them TO THE
REST OF THE COUNTRY. You should have backed down, you didn't; even a
weatherman could have predicted that would everyone pounce.
Third, you called JD to the table on riding skills, why, what's the
point, your not going to ride with him. While he may not be a
compasionate useneter he is respected as a rider, choosing to go down
that road was just bizarre. He may indeed not live up to all the hype
but who give a ****.