World Naked Bike Ride

[? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}]

"Andrew Morris" <[email protected]> writes:

> there's nothing WRONG with top posting...

There is plenty wrong with top posting. It makes the articals posted
hard to read.

> it's your view, pal... get over it, get off the soapbox, and accept that you
> have a view that is not shared by the greater internet community.

The greater internet community prefurs bottem posting.

--
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia. See
http://dformosa.zeta.org.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html to find out more.
Free the Memes.

 

[Plodder]

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:ca482j$e83> As
usual you've got the wrong end of the stick. I didn't start this but
> that's no reason for me not to finish it. Top posting has never been
> acceptable in this news group. If you want people to give it a rest then
go
> after the troublemakers, not me.

I've seen almost nobody else squeak about top or bottom posting with the
vehemence you display. How can you state that "top posting has never been
acceptable inthis news group" when you seem to be in the minority?

I repeat my call for you to provide references to back your claim that top
poosting is wrong in the majority view. By references I don't mean the links
you've posted that merely reflect your point of view. If you can show,
using, for example, a survey with a significant sample size, that a majority
of usenet users find top posting unacceptable, perhaps you can gain some
credibility and we can all stand corrected. You can than have the high moral
ground since it seems to mean so much to you while the rest of us don't care
very much.

Frank (amazed at myself that I take the time to comment on such
trivialities!)

 

[Theo Bekkers]

"DRS" wrote
> I looked up "whiner"in the dictionary. It had your picture.

Why am I not surprised you have a 'picture' dictionary.

Theo

 

[Theo Bekkers]

"Plodder" wrote
> I repeat my call for you to provide references to back your claim that top
> poosting is wrong in the majority view.

Well, I think top 'poosting' is wrong.



Theo

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> I haven't whined once, unlike yourself.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> I haven't whined once, unlike yourself.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> I haven't whined once, unlike yourself.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> I haven't whined once, unlike yourself.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.

"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> I haven't whined once, unlike yourself.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[DRS]

"L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Oh look, more whining.

There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[DRS]

"L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Oh look, more whining.

There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[DRS]

"L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Oh look, more whining.

There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[DRS]

"L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Oh look, more whining.

There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[DRS]

"L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Oh look, more whining.

There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.






"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.






"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.






"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.






"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[L'acrobat]

Oh look, more whining.






"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "L'acrobat" <husky65@delete_me.netspace.net.au> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Oh look, more whining.
>
> There can't be more when there weas never any in the first place.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

 

[Plodder]

"Theo Bekkers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Plodder" wrote
> > I repeat my call for you to provide references to back your claim that
top
> > poosting is wrong in the majority view.
>
> Well, I think top 'poosting' is wrong.
>
>
>
> Theo

Oops! That's got to be someone else's fault. Everything is, isn't it?

And from there, DRS goes to the 'no credibility 'killfile...