Cat 3 fun

Discussion in 'Road Cycling' started by Warren, Aug 8, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nick Burns

    Nick Burns Guest

    "warren" <[email protected]> wrote in message news

    Then I need to know... Is
    > "never_doped" really Andy Coggan?
    >
    > -WG

    Cafe de Colombia
     


  2. On 8/11/03 10:25 PM, in article [email protected], "Nick Burns"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    > "warren" <[email protected]> wrote in message news
    >
    > Then I need to know... Is
    >> "never_doped" really Andy Coggan?
    >>
    >> -WG
    >
    > Cafe de Colombia
    >
    >
    On 8/10/03 7:10 PM, in article 100820031908595551%[email protected], "warren"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>, gwhite <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> Carl Sundquist wrote:
    >>>
    >>> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> THE POMERANIAN IS IN THE HOUSE!!!
    >>
    >> Yes, yes, I love it here. I love you all. kiss kiss kiss.
    >
    > Oops. I thought the "Precious Pup" guy was a reincarnation of "The Pomeranian". So it's two
    > different guys?! Then I need to know... Is "never_doped" really Andy Coggan?
    >
    > -WG
    They are the same..................

    gwhite <[email protected]> X-Trace: home.itg.ti.com 1060494882 6065
    146.252.12.99 (10Aug 2003 05:54:42 GMT)

    "never_doped" <[email protected]> wrote: X-Trace: home.itg.ti.com 1060566472 29761 146.252.12.99
    (11 Aug 2003 01:47:52 GMT)
     
  3. Gwhite

    Gwhite Guest

    Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
    >
    > "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > >
    > > Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
    > > >
    > > > "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > > Scott Hendricks wrote in reply to Zlotlow:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Perhaps the masters are easier than the pro/1/2 fields,
    > > >
    > > > Dumbass -
    > > >
    > > > that particular statement is the one I was addressing.
    > >
    > > Dumbass,
    > >
    > > That is a neat trick. I mean, making time go backwards. But you don't
    > believe
    > > what the Second Law says, so I suppose it is no surprise.
    >
    > Dumbass -
    >
    > That's the statment I was addressing.
    >
    > You thought I was addressing something else. What's the big deal?

    I like this one right where it lies.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...